Question 1

What is Testimony-Weighted Infrastructure Estimate?

Accepted Answer

**Plain read:** A methodology for evaluating secret-infrastructure claims rigorously. Every claim gets scored on two axes: (1) how close was the witness to what they're describing (did they build it / work there / visit / hear about it), and (2) is there independent evidence (commodity flows, satellite imagery, seismology, declassified documents)? Claims that score high on proximity and high on corroboration get treated as likely real. Claims with high testimony but zero corroboration (Dulce Base) get treated as contested. This prevents both default-dismissal and default-credulity. Report #75 uses this methodology to revise Phil Schneider's '131 underground bases' claim down to a ~20-40 node synthesis.

TECHNICAL: Every facility claim is scored along witness proximity (0-5) + independent corroboration (commodity-flow, seismic, InSAR, satellite-thermal, declassified-document evidence). Prevents both default-dismissal (C-hypothesis collapse) and default-credulity (H-hypothesis inflation).

Question 2

How does Testimony-Weighted Infrastructure Estimate relate to the Psychohistory Prediction Engine?

Accepted Answer

Testimony-Weighted Infrastructure Estimate is one of 139 core concepts in the Psychohistory Prediction Engine, which uses 8 independent frameworks and 1,674 nodes to map structural pressure from 2026 to 2040. **Plain read:** A methodology for evaluating secret-infrastructure claims rigorously. Every claim gets scored on two axes: (1) how close was the witness to what they're describing (did they build it /