The Radical Antinomian Sect Hillman Wrongly Collapses Into 'Original Christianity'
Epiphanius of Salamis (4th-c. bishop + heresiologist) documented the Borborite-Phibionite Gnostic sect in *Panarion* Section 26. Described libertine practices: sexual sacraments, alleged consumption of semen + menstrual blood, cited the lost text *Greater Questions of Mary* in which Jesus purportedly engaged in sexual intercourse + commanded consumption of semen as 'eucharist' ('Thus we must do, that we may live').
Hillman's claim: Borborites were authentic continuation of original Christianity; institutional Christianity was 4th-century cover-up of a drug-and-sex cult.
Engine verdict: FALSIFIED collapse of two-stream architecture. Mainstream Gnostic-studies scholarship (Birger Pearson, Karen King) treats Borborites as genuine but marginal antinomian splinter sect — radical current, not foundational institutional stream. Epiphanius's account is heresy-hunter polemic (may accurately represent a real sectarian practice but is hostile + selective).
Sociophysics Ising read: high-temperature chaotic sects (Borborites) cannot scale to imperial hegemony. Institutional Christianity survived + scaled precisely because it cooled its phase state, rejected pharmakeia, established strict sober boundary conditions.
Engine integrates: Borborites + Greater Questions of Mary as nodes in Antinomian Chain scorecard. Two-stream architecture preserved. Sub-case: see Divergence 'Institutional Christianity and Antinomian Pharmacology — Two Streams or One Suppressed Stream?' Engine resolved: Two Streams.